CloudQA vs Mabl (2025): Why CloudQA Is the Smarter Mabl Alternative for Agile Teams

When evaluating intelligent test automation tools in 2025, Mabl and CloudQA are both strong contenders. Both platforms promise fast automation, AI-driven reliability, and simplified test creation. But they’re built with different audiences in mind.

In this comparison, we’ll explore features, ease of use, and pricing to show why CloudQA is often the smarter choice for agile SaaS teams, startups, and product-led companies who want powerful test automation without the complexity and overhead of enterprise-focused platforms like Mabl.

Top 3 Reasons to Choose CloudQA Over Mabl

1. Ease of Use for Non-Developers

Mabl’s AI-powered testing is flexible, but creating advanced scenarios often requires developer involvement or complex configurations. CloudQA offers a true codeless test editor with intuitive visual recording and editing, making it simple for product managers, QA analysts, and non-technical teams to automate at scale.

Empower your whole team to build and maintain tests — not just developers.

2. Transparent Pricing for Growing Teams

Mabl operates on enterprise-focused pricing models that can be opaque for smaller teams. CloudQA provides straightforward tiered pricing starting at $99/month — no hidden costs, no lengthy sales cycles.

Scale your testing without enterprise contracts or sticker shock.

3. UI + API Automation in One Flow

Mabl is primarily focused on UI and end-user experience testing, while CloudQA allows you to integrate UI and API steps within the same test. This makes it easier to validate modern SaaS workflows that combine front-end actions with backend responses.

Test your product’s full flow, from button click to API call, in one tool.

Side-by-Side Comparison: CloudQA vs Mabl (2025)

Features

CloudQA

Mabl

Codeless Testing

✅ Visual recorder, no-code editor

⚠ AI-driven UI, but setup may require scripting

API Testing

✅ Built-in API automation with chaining

⚠ Supported, but primarily UI-focused

AI-Powered Features

⚠ Semi-automated element repair

✅ Smart healing, ML-driven insights

End-to-End Testing

✅ UI + API in a single flow

✅ Strong UI, limited API depth

Data-Driven Testing

✅ Spreadsheet-style inputs

✅ Data-driven scenarios supported

Cross-Browser Support

✅ Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge

✅ Wide browser coverage

Mobile Testing

⚠ Via browser emulators

✅ Mobile web testing supported

Visual Regression Testing

✅ Screenshot comparison, Bug Snap

✅ Visual change detection

Execution Speed

✅ Parallel testing by default

✅ Parallel runs available

Integrations

✅ Jira, Jenkins, Slack, GitHub, CI/CD tools

✅ Jira, Slack, CI/CD pipelines

Team Collaboration

✅ Role-based access, shared suites

✅ Strong collaboration features

Test Maintenance

✅ Simple updates via visual editor

✅ AI-assisted self-healing

Onboarding & Training

✅ Personalized onboarding + free support

⚠ Enterprise-focused support tiers

Pricing Model

✅ Transparent monthly tiers

❌ Enterprise pricing on request

Paid Plans

$99/month

On request

Cloud Hosting

✅ Fully SaaS

Disclaimer: Information given here is for reference only and may not be up to date.

Which Use Case Fits Your Team Best?

Choose Mabl if you’re:

A large enterprise with dedicated QA engineers
Looking for AI-driven test optimization at scale
Running complex CI/CD pipelines with in-house DevOps expertise
Comfortable with enterprise-level pricing

Choose CloudQA if you’re:

A SaaS startup or SMB needing automation without heavy technical lift
A product manager, QA analyst, or business team wanting to own QA
Running frequent regression tests, UI + API flows, or cross-browser validations
Focused on cost-efficiency and fast ROI

Conclusion: CloudQA Is the Smarter Mabl Alternative for Agile Teams

Mabl is a strong enterprise tool with impressive AI features, but its complexity and pricing make it less accessible to lean, fast-moving teams. CloudQA offers a simpler, more affordable, and equally powerful alternative for modern agile teams who want results without the overhead:

✅ Truly no-code testing for non-devs
✅ UI + API testing in one workflow
✅ Transparent, scalable pricing

✅ Faster onboarding and lower maintenance overhead
✅ Ideal for SaaS teams, startups, and product-led companies